FL boards' Grim Game Unmasked

---

 His unsigned email “complaint” to PRN (December 27, 2023)—admitted under oath as lacking a signature—violates § 456.073(1)’s core requirement for a legally sufficient, authenticated filing, rendering the entire DOH investigation a nullity from the outset; yet the audacity of proceeding without it, dragging me  to court on this ghost document, is a procedural middle finger to due process (§ 120.57).  

 Dahlin’s “loose” grasp on “unspecified psychosis,” as a neurosurgeon not a psychiatrist, is laughably unqualified, his “clinical opinion” a house of cards built on anecdotal “perceptions” (e.g., roof sounds as delusions) without DSM-5-TR criteria or APA-mandated evidence review, brazenly confessing “I don’t care” about my 100,000 photos and texts as “rants,” a willful blindness that shreds any pretense of good faith.  

  The absurdity of Dr. Dahlin accusing me of psychosis for Teladoc malfunctions—despite swearing he “didn’t investigate the system” and has “no idea” if my beliefs are false—is jaw-dropping unqualified arrogance: a neurosurgeon slapping a life-ruining label on a whistleblower echoed by thousands plagued by the platform’s glitches.

Reddit threads (2023-2025) scream of “unresponsive apps” and “declined appointments leaving patients in limbo”; Capterra blasts “terrible system & customer service blaming internal glitches”; Indeed decries software “slowing consults” amid “abundance of spam” and failed med orders—a chaotic mess Teladoc’s FAQ dodges with vague “technical difficulties.” 

 Treese’s Bleeding-Wound Psychosis Farce:


“IT PRESENTED ITSELF!” 

...argued Treese, diagnosing without inquiry—like Salem girls’ invisible specters condemning the innocent. 

Dr. Treese’s audacity is breathtaking—a board-certified psychiatrist, appointed by Fl DOH, admitting he didn’t ask about psychosis symptoms because they “presented spontaneously” is an arrogant shortcut, treating trauma as pathology without differential diagnosis, a tactic that echoes historical misuse of psychiatry to silence dissent (e.g., Soviet dissidents). 

Dr. Treese diagnosing me with “unspecified psychosis” without asking a single symptom question is a brazen mockery of psychiatric standards, and a flagrant violation of the American Psychiatric Association’s Practice Guidelines, requiring thorough symptom review and quantitative measures for psychotic disorders. 

The judge’s flippant remark that “there are mistakes that show up in documents all the time” dismisses Treese’s uncorrected date error (May vs. April 16, 2024) and my concerns about dual files/separate systems as trivial, outrageously downplaying a potential fraud vector (e.g., falsified evaluations) that could nullify the proceeding under § 120.57(1)(e) for incurable procedural defects. 

Fl DOH created a 2-file system for me. I have a duplicate active license, incorrect dates on evaluations (I am still waiting for the copy of the correct eval on 04/16/24). One file is notarized and the other one is not (interrogatories; uploaded). 

The Fl DOH’s audacity in suggesting I should have “submitted to whatever penalty the Department wanted to impose” is a chilling revelation of institutional blackmail, a grotesque threat to coerce submission to fabricated charges of “unspecified psychosis” without a signed complaint or evidence review, all while the DOH itself was reeling from RansomHub’s June 2024 cyberattack that stole 100 GB of sensitive data from their systems—exposing over 729,000 Floridians’ records and forcing notifications in September 2024, as reported by HIPAA Journal and StateScoop. 

This hypocrisy is staggering: the DOH, hacked and vulnerable to the very cybercrimes I reported, resolves my whistleblowing on Teladoc’s fraud by slapping a delusional label on me, penalizing or else, essentially holding my career hostage to silence a Republican truth-teller. 

Ms. Ellis’s flagrant refusals to answer inquiries about the duplicate license, parroting "I can't answer that", exemplify the Fl DOH’s audacious stonewalling, a shocking display of bureaucratic arrogance that denies basic transparency in a hearing meant to revoke livelihood. 

Fl DOH and Fl Osteopathic Medical Board continue to ignore my ~2-year pleas and the glaring illegality of dual active licenses under § 459.008 (single-license mandate, no duplicates permitted without cause), suggesting a deliberate blackout. 

 Ms. Ellis’s admits that Fl DOH routinely “hand-serves” legal paperwork to licensees’ addresses of record without requiring signatures, tracking, or verification, in an outrageous abdication of accountability in a process meant to safeguard due process, brazenly treating confidential documents like junk mail tossed willy-nilly into the neighborhood, potentially exposing sensitive medical and personal data to strangers in violation of § 456.057’s confidentiality mandate until probable cause and HIPAA’s strict protections (45 CFR § 164.512) against unauthorized disclosures. 

In a flagrant abdication of judicial duty, the judge dismisses my notice failures and confidentiality breaches, despite § 120.57(1)(b)’s explicit requirement for adequate notice to ensure a fair opportunity to respond. Hand-service without signature or tracking fails this, as Florida courts require reasonable methods for service in administrative actions (e.g., Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.106, allowing certified mail or personal service with acknowledgment, not casual drops). 

The DOH’s “supposedly confidential case” was scattered like confetti, exposing my records to potential identity theft or retaliation amid mafia threats—yet the judge brushes it off with “they’re not on trial,” as if your shattered confidentiality is irrelevant to the “skill and safety” farce they’re peddling.

 This is a shocking contempt for my privacy rights under § 456.057 (confidentiality until probable cause) and the Florida Constitution’s privacy clause (Art. I, § 23). 

The DOH breached my confidentiality (Section 456.057) by sending my initial notification package (January 4, 2024, tracking number 70190140000058587250) to someone else, per USPS Informed Delivery. Per Mr. Morris's email on 02/19/24 “it was tracked to a different address where it was delivered.” However, per Allis Richardson's email on February 1, 2024, "Yes, the address we have on file and where the letter was mailed to is 3540 S. Ocean Blvd #805, Palm Beach, FL 33480”. Yet the letter tracks as “Delivered to Original Sender”. 

I never received it. Where is it?